One of Sahib-Amar Khalsa's coaches at CP Academy (Berkeley High) posed this question for their up-coming coach refresher workshop:
"The main question I have is how to gently but clearly steer a student away
from what seems like a bad overall direction/argument. For instance, a
student chose to compare Oedipus with Nemo (as in Finding Nemo). It had
been a while since I saw Nemo, so I couldn't say for sure that this seemed
like a bad approach. We did find some similarities. But overall, I
suspected she was going to spend a lot of time and was never really going
to get a good paper out of this choice. What to do?"
CAFL program manager Teresa Barnett has this suggestion:
"My first instinct is to say that our goal is to help the student clarify their own ideas rather than impose our own. So, part of the job in this situation might be to ask some gentle questions that could help the student arrive at the conclusion on their own that they might need to shift direction. I know this can be frustrating because it results in a session with more 'discussing' and not as much 'down on paper', but I think that can be ok. I'll toss this question out to a couple of our trainers and see if any of them have some more specific suggestions.... I think we've heard variants of this question over the years, and it actually could be separated into two questions:
1. What to do when a student is "sort of' on track, but working in a direction that will be difficult when there might be some better examples/arguments/evidence, etc. to support a stronger argument?
2. What to do when the student is using examples or pursuing a thesis that is just wrong, or where the examples/evidence actually don't support the thesis at all, etc."
Here's my somewhat similar response to Sahib-Amar and her coach:
I think we should always keep in mind that it's the student's voice we're focusing on, and not the coach's. And we should also keep in mind one of the main points we make early on in the first training session, that our goal is not to generate the perfect paper for the assignment.
But it's also our job to guide students in what we think will be helpful directions. So my instinct here would be a variation of what Teresa is suggesting. The coach could point out that it's always good to have options when considering an approach, and that the student's Oedipus/Nemo idea has merit, so it should definitely be one of the options to consider. Then suggest that the coach and student spend a little time thinking of some other possible approaches, with a goal of ultimately having, say, three ideas from which to choose. If the coach has an idea he or she thinks is better, he or she could suggest that it be on the list. Then, when it comes time to choose, the coach could help the student make the best choice, which might or might not be Nemo. If Nemo seems clearly to not be the best choice to the coach, but the student insists that's the one he or she likes, then I'd say the coach should go with it. And make sure the list of options is on the coach worksheet.
Blog readers: What other suggestions do you have for Sahib-Amar and her coach? You can respond by clicking on the Comments link below this message.
Bob Menzimer